Dense-packed cellulose insulation - the History
In 2005, Metric Homes of Carp, Ontario designed and built Canada's first Energy Star labelled home in Canada. This home was built with dense-packed (or dense-blown) cellulose as the wall insulation of choice. Their intent was to produce a better built home with the goal of creating "a proper balance between additional efficiency and price such that it would be attractive to future clients".
Dense-packed cellulose insulation can be a superior product to commonly used batt insulation, but somehow it has developed a bad reputation in Canada. Cellulose Fibre Insulation (CFI) is like the Rodney Dangerfield of insulations, it "can't get no respect".
When done right, dense-packed cellulose is a highly efficient option for insulating exterior walls. It insulates as well if not better than the average batt (R3.5-3.8/inch), and slows air flow through walls making your house cheaper and easier to heat and cool. In addition, the high density of packed cellulose provides you with a better sound barrier than batt insulation (1).
Modern CFI production began in the 1970s and has been commonly used in roofs across the globe and walls throughout the US and Europe. When cellulose is densely blown (3.0lbs/ft3 or 48kg/m3 or greater) it is an excellent wall cavity insulation that provides a good R value at a reasonable cost. However, it is seldom used in Canada despite its reasonable cost and efficiency.
It has been unfairly criticized for its 'settling' issues, mold issues and its flammability. CFI has fallen victim to the claims of safer, easier and 'better' options such as fiberglass or mineral wool batt insulation. These weaknesses are largely baseless and dense-packed cellulose for wall cavities should be more common in Canada than it is today.
The concern of cellulose in wall cavities settling is probably the biggest misconception, though it is one that originates legitimately because that's what used to happen when it was blown into walls loosely, as it presently is in ceilings. Cellulose in walls is now under pressure so it cannot settle, maintaining the overall performance of its installed R-value. Any warnings on packages of settling is directed at cellulose loosely blown into ceilings.
CFI is commonly manufactured with borate, which is a fire retardant that also resists mold and and insects. In fact borate, in small amounts, has been determined to be largely harmless. "Most common foods contain borates at concentrations of 1-20 ppm, so we ingest up to 1mg/day in our normal diets" (2) and it is certainly less harmful than many toxins found in various adhesives and finishes commonly used in housing construction.
As well, CFI with borate is considered to be more flame resistant than both fiberglass and mineral wool batts (3). The dense packed method in and of itself adds to the flammability resistance. Consider how hard it is to burn a phone book versus burning a single sheet of paper. The lack of air gaps and air circulation make burning a phone book much more difficult than burning a single sheet.
If you are looking to insulate using the greenest of options, CFI is probably for you. It is often manufactured regionally using upwards of 80% recycled materials, acts as carbon storage and requires significantly less energy to manufacture than any batt insulation on the market. Not to mention it will likely get you additional LEED points in any evaluation.
As this is a wood product that has been heavily processed, it is at greater risk of moisture damage than some other materials if not handled and installed properly. But this can be said of many components of a home, and rather than dissuade us from using cellulose, it should encourage us to ensure we use proper building techniques; stopping air leakage and managing moisture diffusion through walls.
A quick look at an Dense-packed cellulose insulation installation in progress:
The biggest weakness for dense-blown cellulose is the lack of understanding of its qualities and effectiveness. For example Ontario Building Code has only a short section stating that dense-blown cellulose meets code, Section 22.214.171.124, but offers very few details or further explanation.
Gene Goodreau, CEO of Eco Insulation in southern Ontario says that one of the biggest problems he faces is the resistance by both builders and inspectors to change or appreciate alternative options. Building inspectors need to be educated on CFI for it to be accepted.
This problem is quickly made more obvious with a visit to the Cellulose Manufacturers Association of Canada website, www.cellulose.ca, which provides virtually no information on benefits, qualities, product, installer access and this showcases just how weak an organization they are in Canada.
The site doesn't even have a link to the much more informative US counterpart www.cellulose.org. The American site is filled with quality information about the many benefits and strengths of dense blown cellulose insulation.
The lack of information and misconceptions surrounding this product are not helping make dense-blown cellulose a more commonly used option. However, its value, efficiency and the fact that it is the most environmentally-friendly manufactured wall insulation available to home builders should make any conscientious builder take notice.
All of the manufacturers recommend that CFI be installed professionally with the proper blower. For a basic 2X6 wall construction on 1200/ft2 of wall you can expect to pay about $1.00/ft2 installed. If you add 1" or more of breathable foam insulation on the outside of the wall you will be looking at a minimum of an R25 exterior wall. A typical wall would be built with the following layers from inside to outside:
Dense-packed cellulose wall insulation cuttaway © Ecohome
However, if high efficiency is your goal and you want to build with a significantly higher R-value than building to code, CFI is a particularly great option as it allows you to build a much larger wall cavity with no additional effort.
A high efficiency wall design would be to build a double wall with a 10"+ cavity and at least 2" of vapour permeable rigid insulation on the outside, such as mineral wool or EPS foam. With this design you can get true value upwards of R47, almost twice what Ontario Building Code requires. The cost for the CFI on this design would be less than $2500.00 for an average sized house. An amount you can save in heating costs, starting the moment you turn on a furnace.
The double wall construction will also increase the insulating efficiency by eliminating the thermal bridging heat loss you get in a traditional wall design where the wood studs (only R1 per inch), extend from the outside of the wall to the inside.
There's also another option for building Double-Stud super insulated walls suited for dense packed cellulose insulation - by using a Larsen Truss design - see here to read more and see the video.
However, with greater insulation comes greater risk of condensation because of the longer constant temperatures and the greater temperature differential between inside and out. In this situation, it is recommended to use a semi-permeable retarder on the inside of the wall rather than the traditional 6 mil poly, to allow walls to also dry inwards. This is especially important in homes with air conditioning.
Dense-blown cellulose is a quality product that has many benefits above and beyond the traditional batt insulations. It is something that should be much more commonly available in Canada than it is today, but that will require change in both its marketability and the stagnant habits of builders.
In addition to outperforming batt insulation on a variety of issues, it is also hands down the most environmentally-friendly choice for insulating your home and the easiest and most affordable if you decide to build a super-insulated home.
Now discover: Which is Best between OSB v Plywood? From the EcoHome Guides
1. Improve Your Home or Building's Thermal Envelope with Dense-Pack Cellulose http://www.buildingenergyvt.com/weatherization-and-insulation/dense-pack-cellulose-insulation/
2. Jennifer Atlee, March 28, 2012 http://greenspec.buildinggreen.com/blogs/toxicological-riddles-case-boric-acid
3. Technical Series 96212. Results of Fire Resistance Tests on Small-Scale Insulated and Non-Insulated Gypsum Board Protected Wall Assemblies: https://www.cmhc-schl.gc.ca