The pros and cons of thermal mass in buildings
Dense materials hold more heat than light fluffy stuff does. This can work for or against you.
Timber frame home with polished concrete floors © Bala Structures
Materials in a home that act as thermal mass are things like concrete, masonry, ceramic tiles, even wood with timber frames for example. Intentionally adding greater amounts of thermal mass in a building can be an advantage or a disadvantage depending on a lot of factors, and there is no singular right answer as to whether or not it will benefit you specifically on a day-to-day basis.
Turning down thermostats to save energy:
A lot of us grew up watching our parents turn thermostats down for the day and back up when returning home in the evening. This saved energy for one main reason - older houses weren't built anywhere close to the energy-efficiency standards of today, so maintaining a lower constant temperature during the day did in fact save a lot of energy, and for the following reason:
The rate of heat loss increases as the temperature differential between two environments increases, and it does so in something of a bell curve. This applies to something as simple as a cup of hot coffee - a very hot cup will drop its first 10 degrees much faster than it will drop ten degrees when it's only lukewarm.
To equate that same principle to an old house and lowering the thermostat, less heat loss occurred during the day when the house was cooler because that decreased the differential between the indoor and outdoor temperatures.
As homes perform much better now than in the past, those savings aren't as drastic anymore. And with a house that has little heat loss to begin with and a lot of thermal mass in it, any such savings pretty much cease to exist because it might take the entire day to drop even a full degree.
The disadvantages of thermal mass in homes:
Let's speak to the potential downsides of thermal mass first - if a home is regularly left empty for several days at a time or if you keep a cottage heated for weekend use only, having a lot of thermal mass may not be advantageous. It will take a longer time to cool to a lower temperature setting, then it will also take more time to heat up again as the thermal mass in the home slowly recharges with heat.
If you have timers or control your heating system with your smart phone (yes this is possible if you haven't yet heard of it), then you can at least avoid the discomfort during the time it takes to heat up again, compared to walking into a cold house that may take hours to warm after you turn up the thermostat by hand.
Thermal mass in homes can also be something of a disadvantage in summer - for those who live without air conditioning and count on opening windows at night to cool a house, it will take longer to release heat if it is stored in tons of dense material. During a heat wave you’ll win for the first couple of nights but you will probably find the temperature creeping up a couple of degrees a day, and when the heat wave breaks it may be a while before your house cools again.
The advantages of thermal mass in homes:
A lot of thermal mass in a home can help naturally balance temperatures in spring and fall when days are warm but nights are still cool. That will either increase comfort or reduce the need for heating and cooling.
Heat security: Having heat 'stored' in your house can be a big advantage in winter in the case of power outages, as virtually all heating systems rely on electricity to at least get started, and to deliver the heat. If your house stays warm longer there is less chance you will either be uncomfortably cold or need to stay elsewhere until the power comes back.
Heating during off-peak hours: If you rely on radiant heat from thermal mass such as heated concrete floors, this can make heating with electricity a more realistic option in regions with high peak rates. A radiant floor can be charged with heat overnight during low rate hours, and timed to stay off during peak rate hours.
Interior brick wall © Ecohome
Comfort: Prepare to be surprised... it's a misconception that a thermostat set at 'room temperature' will determine how comfortable you are in a conditioned space; the majority of what you actually experience (about 60%) is the heat that radiates to and from you and the various surfaces of your home, which is defined as the mean radiant temperature (MRT).
In simple terms, if the surfaces of your home are below that of your body temperature (walls, windows, floors), you will radiate heat towards them. If they are above your body temperature, they will radiate heat towards you. So even if the thermometer in a room reads a comfortable 21 degrees Celsius, if the surrounding surfaces are much cooler, you will feel cooler. This is one way that thermal mass in a home can be used to increase your comfort.
So, should you include thermal mass in a building?
As mentioned at the beginning, there is really no right or wrong answer to this question. Sometimes it helps, other times it doesn't. If you've received council that you 'should' or 'shouldn't' include significant thermal mass in your home, that isn't entirely accurate unless your building envelope and lifestyle have been figured into the conclusion, along with whether or not you have a wood stove as a backup in case of emergencies. Personally, I like thermal mass in a home, but that's my just my preference. So don't sweat it too much either way.